Careful Copy

The rules behind every review

Every finding in a Careful Copy report names the rule it came from. These are those rules: what each one covers, what we suggest instead, and how much it weighs against the score. 55 rules, published so you can check any finding rather than take it on trust.

A rule is a pattern, not a verdict. Finding one on your page does not mean the sentence is wrong, and the report says so: each item quotes your wording, gives the reason, and suggests a replacement you can accept or ignore. Standard medical vocabulary is never a finding. A rewrite never adds a fact, a number or a credential that was not already on your site.

Weight is what the rule costs against the trust and clarity score: Fix is 15 points, Rewrite is 6, Note is 2. The same rule counts at most twice on one page. Legal review items carry no weight at all.

Framing

What a careful reader could take the page to mean. These are about certainty, finality and urgency, not about vocabulary: standard medical terms are never a finding.

Framing rules
RuleWhat it coversWhat we suggestWeight
FR-01Certainty overclaimoutcomes, diagnoses or effects stated as certain, universal or guaranteed. "Guaranteed results", "painless", "100% success", "permanently removes", "cures".shield-verb rewrite (SV) that keeps the information and drops the certainty.Fix
FR-02Diagnostic finalitythe service presented as the end of the patient's journey. "Get your diagnosis online", "Know for sure", "Final answer". For second-opinion and telehealth profiles: any implication that the treating physician is no longer needed.consultative bridge (ST-03), reposition as one input to a discussion.Fix
FR-03Urgency and emergencylanguage that invites urgent or emergency reliance on the service, or creates artificial urgency. "Immediate help", "don't wait", "emergency consultations online".remove urgency; add redirect to local emergency services where relevant.Fix
FR-04Implied primary care / doctor-patient relationshipProfile-dependent. For informational services (second-opinion, some telehealth): any copy implying treatment, prescribing, or an ongoing care relationship. For practices: not a finding.scope statement (ST-01).Rewrite
FR-05Directive treatment language"You should", "You must", "Your doctor should", "Stop taking", instructions addressed to the reader about their own treatment."Patients may wish to discuss with their treating physician whether..."Rewrite
FR-06Adjudication of other clinicianscopy framing the provider as correcting, overruling or judging another clinician's work. "Your radiologist may have missed", "Second opinions catch errors".independent parallel view framing.Rewrite
FR-07Superlatives without support"leading", "best", "number one", "top clinic", "most experienced" without a verifiable, cited basis.replace with a specific, verifiable fact or remove.Rewrite
FR-08Invented or unverifiable numberspatient counts, success rates, years of experience, review counts with no source.keep only numbers the customer can verify; mark others for confirmation.Rewrite
FR-09Fear-based persuasioncopy that leverages fear of illness to drive action. "Every day you wait...", "Could be cancer".neutral information plus a calm next step.Rewrite
FR-11Standard of perfectioncopy implying the service cannot err or catches everything. "Error-free", "we never miss", "flawless reporting", "100% accurate", "every detail found", "no detail is overlooked".describe the process, not the outcome. "A structured sub-specialty review with a documented reporting process."Fix
FR-10Scope driftservices or conditions mentioned that the provider does not offer, "coming soon" specialties, plural-provider language for a single practitioner (profile-dependent). Weight: Fix where a page offers a service the provider states elsewhere that it does not provide, since a patient can book on the strength of it. Rewrite for narrower drift.align copy to the confirmed scope; single-provider language where applicable.Rewrite

Clinical wording

The vocabulary that turns a description into a promise, and what to use instead.

Clinical wording rules
RuleWhat it coversWhat we suggestWeight
SV-01Prohibited certainty constructions (EN)"confirms", "rules out", "excluded with confidence", "diagnostic of", "proves", "means that", "You have", "Your scan shows", "The diagnosis is", "cures", "eliminates", "permanently", "guaranteed", "always", "never fails", "100%".no rewrite offeredRewrite
SV-02Preferred formulations (EN)"may be consistent with", "features favour", "interpreted as more consistent with X than Y", "suggest the possibility of", "findings raise the possibility of", "is commonly used for", "may help with", "is intended to", "many patients experience", "to support discussion with your treating physician".no rewrite offered
SV-03Prohibited certainty constructions (DE)"bestätigt", "schließt aus", "beweist", "eindeutig", "garantiert", "heilt", "dauerhaft beseitigt", "Sie haben", "Ihr Befund zeigt", "die Diagnose lautet", "immer", "zu 100 %", "schmerzfrei" (as an absolute), "risikofrei", "nebenwirkungsfrei".no rewrite offeredRewrite
SV-04Preferred formulations (DE)"kann vereinbar sein mit", "die Befunde sprechen eher für", "deutet auf die Möglichkeit hin", "wird häufig eingesetzt bei", "kann unterstützen", "ist darauf ausgelegt", "viele Patientinnen und Patienten berichten", "zur Besprechung mit Ihrer behandelnden Ärztin oder Ihrem Arzt".no rewrite offered
SV-05Reader-directed diagnosisSecond person plus a diagnosis or outcome ("You have", "Sie leiden an") outside a clearly hypothetical FAQ framing. Rewrite in third person or conditional.no rewrite offeredFix
SV-06Comparative to other clinicians"more accurate than your doctor", "genauer als Ihr Radiologe". Rewrite as independent parallel view (FR-06).no rewrite offeredRewrite
SV-07Reassurance and normalityreassurance stated as a settled fact. "Is normal", "perfectly healthy", "nothing to worry about", "no treatment is necessary", "you don't need to see anyone about this".technical precision plus a bridge. "Within physiological limits", "no focal abnormality is demonstrated on this study", "consider discussing [finding] with your treating physician". Wording that instructs the reader to start or stop treatment is FR-05.Rewrite

Structure

Whether the page answers first, says who is responsible, and sends the reader back to their own clinician.

Structure rules
RuleWhat it coversWhat we suggestWeight
ST-01Scope statement presentProfile-dependent. Informational services (second-opinion, telehealth-informational) need a scope statement on every major page with four elements: what the service is; it supports discussion with the treating physician; no doctor-patient relationship is created; it does not diagnose or treat. Practices and aesthetics clinics need a shorter statement of what is offered and that individual suitability is assessed in consultation.generate from the profile's template, filled only with facts present on the site.Rewrite
ST-02Answer block under H1Service, condition, treatment and FAQ-anchor pages should open with a 45 to 60 word block directly under the H1 covering, in order: what the service is; who performs it (named, credentialed); scope; method or modality; timeframe if applicable; named frameworks where relevant; closing bridge to the treating physician or to a consultation.draft the block from facts on the page. Never add facts.Rewrite
ST-03Consultative bridgeEvery clinical content section ends by redirecting to the treating physician or to an individual consultation. Absence on a clinical page is a finding.one closing sentence.Rewrite
ST-04FAQ shape (Punch-Flow-Punch)FAQ answers: one direct answer sentence; two to four sentences of context with shield-verb framing and named frameworks where relevant; one closing bridge sentence.reshape existing answers; keep facts, change shape.Note
ST-05Headline accessibilityPatient-facing headlines lead with plain language; clinical entity terms belong in the subtitle or first sentence, not the H1 alone. "Understanding your brain MRI results" beats "Neuroradiological assessment of intracranial pathology".hybrid headline.Note
ST-06Emergency redirectPages describing symptoms or urgent conditions must state that the service is not for emergencies and point to local emergency services.no rewrite offeredFix
ST-07Single vs plural provider consistencyCopy must match the profile's provider count. "Our team of specialists" for a single practitioner is a finding; the reverse is not.no rewrite offeredRewrite

Authority and search readiness

Whether a named, credentialed person stands behind the page, and whether a search engine can tell.

Authority and search readiness rules
RuleWhat it coversWhat we suggestWeight
EA-01Named practitionerClinical pages name the responsible practitioner with credentials. "Our specialists", "our Clinical Lead", "our team" with no name where a name exists on the site is a finding.insert the name and credential as they appear on the site's profile page; link to that page. Never invent or upgrade credentials.Fix
EA-02Canonical profile pageOne page holds the full profile: name, photo, credentials, registrations, memberships, conflict-of-interest or ownership disclosure where relevant. Every mention links to it.no rewrite offeredRewrite
EA-03Author byline on articlesBlog and guide pages carry a named author with credential and a "reviewed by" line where the author is not the clinician.no rewrite offeredRewrite
EA-04Structured dataOrganisation pages: MedicalOrganization or MedicalClinic schema. Practitioner pages: Physician. FAQ pages: FAQPage. Articles: MedicalWebPage with author. Missing or generic (Organization only) is a finding.JSON-LD skeleton filled only from facts on the page.Rewrite
EA-05Credential precisionCredentials stated exactly as held. "Neuroradiologist" where the site elsewhere says "radiologist with a focus on neuroradiology" is a finding (route also to LR-01).no rewrite offeredRewrite
EA-06Editorial and review policy pagesSites with articles should have an editorial policy and a medical review process page.no rewrite offeredNote
EA-07Dated and reviewed contentArticles show a last-reviewed date and reviewer.no rewrite offeredNote
EA-08Entity and framework termsCondition pages benefit from correctly used clinical entity terms and framework names (e.g. McDonald criteria, RANO, Fazekas) where the provider actually applies them.Suggest only where the site already indicates use; never add frameworks.Note
EA-09Internal linking to authority surfacesService pages link to the practitioner profile, the process page and the relevant FAQ.no rewrite offeredNote
EA-10Contact and physical presenceAddress, registration body, and how to reach a human are easy to find.no rewrite offeredNote

House style

Editorial quality. Mostly notes rather than blocking findings.

House style rules
RuleWhat it coversWhat we suggestWeight
HS-01Em dashesFrequent em dashes read as machine-written and reduce perceived expertise. Suggest commas, full stops or colons.no rewrite offeredNote
HS-02"Board-certified" outside the USUse the local credential: "Facharzt für ...", "Consultant ...", "specialist registered with ...". US customers: not a finding.no rewrite offeredRewrite
HS-03Sentence case headingsTitle Case Every Word reads as templated. Suggest sentence case.no rewrite offeredNote
HS-04Paragraph lengthHealth pages: three to five sentences per paragraph. Walls of text are a finding.no rewrite offeredNote
HS-05Bullet overuseBullets only where content is list-shaped. Clinical explanations in bullets lose the shield framing.no rewrite offeredNote
HS-06Alt textAlt text describes the image literally. Alt text that duplicates the adjacent headline, or is keyword-stuffed, is a finding. Decorative images: empty alt.no rewrite offeredNote
HS-07Emoji in medical contentRemove.no rewrite offeredRewrite
HS-08Jargon without explanationClinical terms used without a plain-language gloss on patient-facing pages.no rewrite offeredNote
HS-09Regional spelling consistencyUK pages: UK spelling throughout (tumour, haemorrhage, optimise). US pages: US spelling throughout (tumor, hemorrhage, optimize). Mixed spelling is a finding.no rewrite offeredNote
HS-10Exclamation marks in medical contentRemove.no rewrite offeredNote

Legal review items

Never rewritten. These are listed with the quote and the page so you can take one clear list to a lawyer. They do not affect the score.

Legal review items rules
RuleWhat it coversWhat we suggestWeight
LR-01Credentials, registrations, specialty titlesAny credential, title or registration claim. We cannot verify them.no rewrite offered
LR-02Insurance and indemnity statementsno rewrite offered
LR-03Country, eligibility and cross-border claims"Available in ...", "licensed in ...", "serving patients worldwide".no rewrite offered
LR-04Consent flows and data handlingForms, uploads, cookie banners, privacy wording, health data statements.no rewrite offered
LR-05Prices, discounts, refunds, financingPrice presentation, bundles, discounts, vouchers, payment plans.no rewrite offered
LR-06Mandatory informationImpressum / legal notice, professional body, supervisory authority, VAT, registration numbers, complaint routes. Pages matching these patterns run in framing mode only.no rewrite offered
LR-07Testimonials, reviews, case historiesListed here in addition to any DE/UK pattern flag, because removal or retention is a decision with legal weight.no rewrite offered
LR-08Before/after imageryno rewrite offered
LR-09Prescription medicines, devices, named productsAny promotional mention of a prescription medicine, medical device or branded product.no rewrite offered
LR-10Guarantees and warrantiesAny explicit guarantee wording.no rewrite offered

Country layers

Some phrasing is read differently by the advertising rules of a particular country. Where a site markets to patients in Germany or the United Kingdom, an extra layer of pattern checks applies, and anything it finds is listed under Legal review items with the quote and the page. We never state that something breaks a rule of law, and we never apply a law to your case.

Those layers are not published here. Each pattern carries a reference to a statute or a ruling, and every one of ours is marked for confirmation by a qualified lawyer in that country before the layer is sold. Publishing our unconfirmed reading of German or British advertising law would be exactly the kind of claim this service exists to discourage. They will be published when counsel has been through them.

Profiles

The same rule set is applied differently depending on what the site is. A dental practice is not a second-opinion service, and an agency selling to clinics is neither. Six profiles exist: practice, dental, aesthetics, telehealth, second-opinion, and agency. The profile decides which rules are heightened, which do not apply, and what a good opening paragraph looks like for that kind of page.

Changes

The rule set is versioned and dated, and every report records the version it was produced under. Rules change when a review shows they are wrong: the scoring was changed after our own site scored 100 on pages that had findings, and the agency profile exists because reviewing our own site showed there was no profile that fitted.

Careful Copy is not a law firm. These rules are editorial, they do not assess the legality of anything, and what you publish is your decision.