Live Read against rule set 2026.09-07
We read every line on your clinic's site and hand back the wording to use instead. Start with your homepage, free.
Your review of arrives by email within 24 hours.
No patient data, please. Page text is deleted after the review.
Back inside 24 hours. No account, no card.
Your wording, the replacement, the reason and the rule. Nothing is flagged without all four.
Removed: A consultant neuroradiologist reviews your brain, head or spine MRI. In 24 hours.
Replaced with: A consultant radiologist with a sub-specialty focus in neuroradiology reviews your brain, head or spine MRI. In 24 hours.
The profile page gives the credential as Consultant Radiologist with a sub-specialty focus in neuroradiology. The headline states a different one. EA-05
Removed: Independent specialist review of your MRI or CT by a European-registered neuroradiologist.
Listed for your lawyer. No wording suggested.
Which specialty title may be used differs by country, so this goes on the legal review list with the page and the reason, and does not affect the score. LR-01
Removed: Neuroradiology is the most demanding field in radiology.
Replaced with: Neuroradiology is a demanding sub-specialty.
A superlative with no stated basis. The About page already uses the careful version. FR-07
48 out of 100
The score starts at 100 and drops with each item. This one is the Radiology Prime site review, seven pages, published in full.
What would yours be?
Free. One page. By email inside 24 hours.
The full seven-page review of that radiology practice is published on this site. Score, summary by area, every finding with its replacement, and the legal items kept separate.
No email, no gate. If the work is not good, you should be able to see that in two minutes.
Open the full report
Six areas, versioned and dated. Every finding cites one, so you can follow the reasoning and reject it.
Read every rule in full Version 2026.09-07, last reviewed 21 September 2026. Jurisdiction rules for Germany, the UK and the EU are applied but not published.
The checks run automatically against the published rule set. The rules themselves were written for a European specialist second-opinion service, where every sentence about imaging findings has to be findable, clear and careful.
Named authority is one of the six areas. A page with no named author is one of the first things a review flags, including this one.
Peter Pohlmann
Runs the content side of a European medical second-opinion service and wrote the rules this review applies. Operated from Portugal.
$99 once
Fourteen day refund, no questions.
Rewrite covers your five or fifteen highest-value pages, in your voice, within five working days. Agency plans are white-labelled across ten client domains.
Partly. Search readiness is one of the six areas, because schema and bylines matter. But the work is editorial: we tell you which sentences to change and why. We do not build links, we do not buy placements, and we make no ranking promises.
Yes. The checks run automatically against the published rule set, and no person reads your report before you do. It suggests wording and structure; it does not assess legality and never certifies anything.
No. It is editorial review. Legal review items are listed separately, carry no suggested wording and do not affect the score, precisely so you can hand that list to your lawyer instead of guessing.
No. We read your public pages, the same ones a patient reads. No logins, no plugins, no code on your site, and no patient data at any point.
Every finding cites the rule it came from, so you can see the reasoning and reject it. Some findings are judgement calls and the report says so. If the review is not useful, the refund runs fourteen days with no questions.
Yes. The agency plan is white-labelled across ten client domains, with team seats and priority turnaround.
One field. Your score and the findings that matter, by email inside 24 hours.
We ask for your email on the next step. No account, no card.